Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy Research Paper - 1

Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy - Research Paper ExampleA presidents foreign policy can be thoroughly diplomatic, while his military billet can play merely the role of a diplomatic apparatus. It is normally determined by the regions economic, military, and sociopolitical statuses. Whereas a presidential doctrine is usually objective-oriented, the implement of this doctrine needs in-depth knowledge of and neat reaction to home economy, politics, military strength, etc. Simultaneously the president should have in-depth knowledge of and proper response to counterpartys economy, politics, military strength, etc. During the developing stage of the Cold War in the first fractional of the 1960s, John Fitzgerald Kennedys foreign policy had been more diplomatic than his predecessor Dwight Eisenhowers unyielding outlook about the US presence in the world politics. The diplomatic essence of the Kennedy Doctrine initially vie a crucial role in building up the very premises Flexible rec eption to the International Political Powers, Containment of Communism and Reversal of Soviet Progress in the West of the Kennedy Doctrine. ... In this take in Gaddis (2005) opined that also the failed CIA- prated military coup in Cuba, in spite of Kennedys promise to refrain from Cuban Affairs, provoked the president to be bold to pronounce the United States defensive stance regarding the Berlin issue and the diplomatic acknowledgement of the Soviet Unions concern in Germany. (Gaddis, 2005, pp. 112-115) Kennedys policy for the containment of communism was fundamentally the legacy of Eisenhower and Trumans foreign policy prerogatives. During the peak-hours of Cold War, Kennedy had no other choice but to look out his White House predecessors (Schweizer, 1994, pp. 65). Being panicked by the rapid communist advancement, both Truman and Eisenhower turned back to the countrys military strength -though they did not go into any direct war- to contain communism. As a result, superpowers involved into proxy wars in various geographical regions of interests. Nuclear arm race amidst the two main parties of the war, the USA and the Soviet Union, began as a response to the superpowers proneness to overpower from each one other. During the period, the world experienced a worldwide regrouping of the countries into the US shove and the Soviet bloc. This regrouping in the Soviet block was mainly based on the Marxist political ideology of Communism, whereas capitalism and democratic interests dominated the countries in the US block. This regroupings in both of the blocks often turned into expansionism and counter-expansionism. (Schweizer, 1994, pp. 69-74) The Soviet leaderships expansionist desire to force Marxist ideals upon the rest of the earth panicked the wealthy capitalist west whose reaction to the communist expansionism eventually